ArticleDigital health
Citizen science to approach machine learning to society: Detecting loneliness in older adults.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning in mental health promotion for older adults: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Even if we are not aware of it, machine learning techniques are part of our daily lives. It is of the utmost interest that citizens become familiar with the use of these techniques and discover their potential to solve everyday problems. Objective and Methods: In this article, we describe the methodology and results of a highly replicable citizen science project that allows citizens to get closer to the scientific process and understand the potential of machine learning to solve a social problem of interest to them. For this purpose, we have chosen a problem of social relevance in contemporary societies, namely the detection of loneliness in older adults. Citizens are challenged to apply machine learning techniques to identify levels of loneliness from natural language. Results: The results of this project suggest that citizens are willing to engage in science when the challenges posed are of social interest to them. A total of 1517 citizens actively engaged in the project. A database containing 1112 texts about loneliness expressions was collected. An accuracy of 83.12% using the logistic regression algorithm and 62.23% accuracy when using the Naïve Bayes algorithm was reached in detecting loneliness from texts. Conclusions: Detecting loneliness using machine learning techniques is an attractive and relevant topic that allows citizens to be involved in science and introduces them to machine learning practices. The methodology of this project can be replicated in other places around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.