Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493619›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Important Crop Pollinators Respond Less Negatively to Anthropogenic Land Use Than Other Animals.

Jessica J Williams, Tim Newbold, Joseph Millard, Vivienne P Groner, Richard G Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica J WilliamsCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-7597
Tim NewboldCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-0051
Joseph MillardDepartment of Life Sciences Natural History Museum London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-3565
Vivienne P GronerCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-7132
Richard G PearsonCentre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3458-0539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-mediated pollination is a key ecosystem service required to some extent by almost three-quarters of the leading human food crops in global food production. Anthropogenic pressures such as habitat loss and land-use intensification are causing shifts in ecological community composition, potentially resulting in declines in pollination services and impacting crop production. Previous research has often overlooked interspecific differences in pollination contribution, yet such differences mean that biodiversity declines will not necessarily negatively impact pollination. Here, we use a novel species-level ecosystem service contribution matrix along with mixed-effects models to explore how groups of terrestrial species who contribute differently to crop pollination respond globally to land-use type, land-use intensity, and availability of natural habitats in the surrounding landscape. We find that the species whose contribution to crop pollination is higher generally respond less negatively (and in some cases positively) to human disturbance of land, compared to species that contribute less or not at all to pollination. This result may be due to these high-contribution species being less sensitive to anthropogenic land conversions, which has led humans to being more reliant on them for crop pollination. However, it also suggests that there is potential for crop pollination to be resilient in the face of anthropogenic land conversions. With such a high proportion of food crops requiring animal-mediated pollination to some extent, understanding how anthropogenic landscapes impact ecological communities and the consequences for pollination is critical for ensuring food security.

Indexed as

croplandecosystem servicesland‐use changepollinationPREDICTS

Identifiers

PMID39493619
PMCPMC11522614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.