ArticleEuropean heart journal open2024
Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with congenital heart disease: a nationwide, register-based, case-control study.
Article in European heart journal open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Right atrial thrombus and pulmonary embolism one year after ventricular septal defect patch repair: successful surgical management of a complicated case.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Urgent right ventricular outflow tract stenting in a dual risks of thrombosis and bleeding in uncorrected adult with cyanotic congenital heart disease: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Anaesthesia for non-cardiac surgery in patients with adult congenital heart disease.BJA education · 2025Review
- Concurrent Acute Limb Ischemia and Pulmonary Embolism in an Adult With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have an increased risk of developing acquired cardiovascular diseases. However, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with CHD is unknown. We aimed to investigate the incidence and risk of VTE in patients with CHD compared with matched controls without CHD. Methods and results: Data from Swedish health registers were used to identify all patients with CHD between 1970 and 2017 in Sweden. Each patient with CHD was matched with 10 controls from the Swedish Total Population Register. The primary outcome of the study was an event of VTE. Follow-up was from birth until VTE, death, or the end of the study (2017). Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate the risk of VTE in patients with CHD and controls. A total of 67 814 patients with CHD and 583 709 matched controls were identified and included in the study. During a mean follow-up of 15.9 (SD ± 12.5) years, 554 (0.8%) patients with CHD and 1571 (0.3%) controls developed VTE. The risk of VTE was 3.3 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-3.4) times higher in patients with CHD than in controls. Patients with conotruncal defects had the highest risk of VTE (hazard ratio 7.06, 95% CI 5.52-9.03). Conclusion: In our nationwide study, we found that the risk of VTE in patients with CHD was more than three times higher than in matched controls. The highest risk of VTE was in patients with the most complex lesions. Further research is crucial to clarify the underlying risk factors and prevent VTE in patients with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.