ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2024
Ritgen's maneuver in childbirth care: A case-control study in a Central Italian setting.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVaginal delivery can cause genital tract trauma and lacerations of different severity. This study aims to establish if routinary use of Ritgen's maneuver decreases the prevalence and severity of perineal lacerations compared to the traditional manual perineal protection (MPP).
methodsThis prospective case-control study was conducted in the labor ward of Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy. One hundred sixteen women who met inclusion criteria were included. The study group (n=58) consisted of women who were assisted using the Ritgen maneuver, whereas the women who gave birth immediately afterward were selected as the control group (n=58). All information was retrieved through electronic medical records.
resultsIn all, 22% women of the study group reported no perineal lacerations compared with 5% of the control group (p=0.007). Regarding the degree of lacerations, the study group exhibited more first-degree lacerations and fewer second-degree lacerations, while the control group exhibited the opposite trend. Among women who received epidural analgesia, 24% of the study group did not experience perineal lacerations, compared to 4.5% of the control (OR=0.15; 95% CI: 0.03-0.72; p=0.008). Similarly, 23.4% of cases in the study group with oxytocin-enhanced labor, experienced no perineal trauma while none in the control group had no perineal trauma in cases of oxytocin augmentation (p=0.005).
conclusionsOur results suggest that using Ritgen's maneuver in childbirth care may reduce the incidence and severity of perineal lacerations, even in the presence of known risk factors for perineal lacerations such as oxytocin augmentation and epidural analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.