Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493534›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

XOLARIS: A 24-Month, Prospective, Natural History Study of 201 Participants with

Robert E MacLaren, Jacque L Duncan, M Dominik Fischer, Byron L Lam, Isabelle Meunier, Mark E Pennesi, Eeva-Marja K Sankila, James A Gow, Jiang Li, So-Fai Tsang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robert E MacLarenOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jacque L DuncanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
M Dominik FischerUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Byron L LamBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Isabelle MeunierNational Reference Centre for Inherited Sensory Diseases, University Hospital of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Mark E PennesiPaul H. Casey Ophthalmic Genetics Division, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Eeva-Marja K SankilaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
James A GowBiogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jiang LiBiogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
So-Fai TsangBiogen Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
XOLARIS Study Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V029762/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To improve the understanding of the natural disease progression of Design: A multicenter, prospective, observational natural history study over 24 months. Participants: Male participants aged ≥7 years with a pathogenic variant in the Methods: Participants were divided into subgroups based on their BCVA score at baseline: 34 to 73 (lower BCVA) or ≥74 (higher BCVA) ETDRS letters. There were 7 visits over 24 months. Main Outcome Measures: Change from baseline in BCVA, retinal sensitivity, low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), fixation stability, contrast sensitivity, visual field, anatomical measures, 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25), intraocular pressure, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Overall, 201 participants were included. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 30.3 (11.9) years in the lower BCVA subgroup (n = 170) and 27.7 (10.1) years in the higher BCVA subgroup (n = 31). The study eye baseline mean (SD) BCVA scores were 59.4 (10.30) and 77.3 (3.95) in the lower and higher BCVA subgroups, respectively; the lower BCVA subgroup had lower retinal sensitivity in the study eye at baseline than the higher BCVA subgroup. Over 24 months, there were small observed changes in BCVA, retinal sensitivity, LLVA, fixation, contrast sensitivity, and fundus photography findings. There were observed mean (SD) changes at 24 months in the lower and higher BCVA subgroups of -1.01 (4.67) and 0.03 (5.83) dB-steradians in the volume of full-field hill of vision, -330.6 (869.51) and -122.7 (22.01) μm in distance from foveal center to the nearest border of preserved fundus autofluorescence, -104.3 (277.80) and -207.1 (171.01) μm in central ellipsoid width, and -2.8 (9.7) and -0.6 (7.6) in VFQ-25 composite score, respectively. There was 1 death from completed suicide. There were no ocular serious adverse events, and most AEs were mild/moderate. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the slow natural progression of XLRP over 24 months in both subgroups and provides important functional, anatomical, and safety data. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Natural history observational studyX-linked retinitis pigmentosaXOLARIS

Identifiers

PMID39493534
PMCPMC11531613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.