ArticleInterspeech2022
Investigating the Impact of Speech Compression on the Acoustics of Dysarthric Speech.
Article in Interspeech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustic and Perceptual Characteristics of Compressed Dysarthric Speech: Implications for Teleassessment.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026Article
- An End-to-End Overview of Clinical Speech AI.IEEE transactions on audio, speech, and language processing (2025) · 2026Article
- Comparison of In-Person and Online Recordings in the Clinical Teleassessment of Speech Production: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acoustic analysis plays an important role in the assessment of dysarthria. Out of a public health necessity, telepractice has become increasingly adopted as the modality in which clinical care is given. While there are differences in software among telepractice platforms, they all use some form of speech compression to preserve bandwidth, with the most common algorithm being the Opus codec. Opus has been optimized for compression of speech from the general (mostly healthy) population. As a result, for speech-language pathologists, this begs the question: is the remotely transmitted speech signal a faithful representation of dysarthric speech? Existing high-fidelity audio recordings from 20 speakers of various dysarthria types were encoded at three different bit rates defined within Opus to simulate different internet bandwidth conditions. Acoustic measures of articulation, voice, and prosody were extracted, and mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the impact of bandwidth conditions on the measures. Significant differences in cepstral peak prominence, degree of voice breaks, jitter, vowel space area, pitch, and vowel space area were observed after Opus processing, providing insight into the types of acoustic measures that are susceptible to speech compression algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.