Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493466›Full record

ArticleJournal of marriage and the family2024

Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.

Christopher A Julian, Wendy D Manning, Claire M Kamp Dush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of marriage and the family, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.Journal of marriage and the family · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visualizing Multiple Sexual Identity Responses Using a Network Approach.Socius : sociological research for a dynamic world
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher A JulianDepartment of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8853-6683
Wendy D ManningDepartment of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-7380
Claire M Kamp DushDepartment of Sociology, Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Mechanisms Underlying Sexual Minority Health Disparities in the United StatesR01HD094081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Claire M Kamp Dush, WENDY D. MANNING · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
Computing and Data CoreP2CHD050959 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN L. · 2016 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050959NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This article outlines for family scholars and researchers designing surveys or searching for data on sexual and gender-diverse (SGD) families the latest methodological advancements in United States population-based surveys for studying SGD partnerships by reviewing five recently collected, publicly available, population-representative data sets. Background: LGBTQIA+ adults and SGD partnerships are an expanding demographic group in the United States. Yet, measurement limitations have restricted studies of these partnerships that use population-based studies. To address this issue, researchers designing population-representative data collections have adopted new strategies to measure SGD partnerships accurately. However, most population representative surveys continue to lack data on growing segments of the LGBTQIA+ population by relying solely on the sex of partners or limited sexual and gender identity measures. Conclusion: We recommend expanding population-based surveys to incorporate inclusive measures of sexual and gender identity, directly asking about the gender composition of a couple and measurement of cohabiting and other nonmarital relationships. These approaches are especially important for understanding relationships among younger populations who do not follow heteronormative relationship trajectories and hold diverse gender and sexual identities. Implications: Although the research opportunities on SGD individuals and partnerships are expanding; researchers must remain mindful of the limitations of current data sets and advocate for updates to the United States population data infrastructure.

Indexed as

cohabitationgenderLGBTQIA+marriagemeasurementsexuality

Identifiers

PMID39493466
PMCPMC11530211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.