Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493441›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024

Vegetarian diet and pregnancy outcome.

Johanna Kristiina Reijonen, Kati Maaria Hannele Tihtonen, Tiina Hannele Luukkaala, Jukka Tapio Uotila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna Kristiina ReijonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland.
Kati Maaria Hannele TihtonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services county of Pirkanmaa, Finland.
Tiina Hannele LuukkaalaTampere University Hospital, Research, Development, and Innovation Center, Finland.
Jukka Tapio UotilaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services county of Pirkanmaa, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Vegetarian diets are becoming increasingly popular. Our aim was to evaluate the association of a vegetarian diet with pregnancy, labor, and newborn's outcome. Study design: This retrospective case-control study included 150 women on a vegetarian diet and 300 omnivores. The data were collected from Tampere University Hospital pregnancy database from January 2015 to April 2021. Diet was a self-reported variable. Outcomes of interest were compared between the groups. The frequency of small-for-gestational age (SGA) newborns and low birth weight were primary outcomes. Other parameters concerning pregnancy, labor, and newborn served as secondary outcomes. Results: The rate of SGA at the 10 % cutoff was lower in the vegetarian group. Based on a definition of two standard deviations, SGA did not differ between the vegetarian diet group and the control group. The median birthweight was significantly higher in the vegetarian group. Gestational diabetes (GDM) was more common in the vegetarian group, however the numbers of large for gestational age (LGA) newborns were comparable between the study groups. Labor induction was more common, and the second stage of labor was longer in the vegetarian group. Preterm births (< 32 Conclusion: According to our results, a vegetarian diet may be considered safe during pregnancy. It was not associated with an increased risk of pregnancy- or neonatal complications.

Indexed as

OmnivoresPregnancyPregnancy outcomeVegetarian diet

Identifiers

PMID39493441
PMCPMC11530811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.