ReviewOncology letters2024
Emergence of FLASH‑radiotherapy across the last 50 years (Review).
Review in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Biophysics of Flash Radiotherapy: Tools for Measuring Tumor and Normal Tissues Microenvironment.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Oxygen Depletion and the Role of Cellular Antioxidants in FLASH Radiotherapy: Mechanistic Insights from Monte Carlo Radiation-Chemical Modeling.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel radiotherapy (RT) approach termed FLASH-RT, which irradiates areas at ultra-high dose rates, is of current interest to medical researchers. FLASH-RT can maintain equivalent antitumor effects while sparing healthy tissue compared with conventional RT (CONV-RT), which uses low dose rates. The sparing effect on healthy tissue after FLASH-RT is known as the FLASH effect. Owing to the FLASH effect, FLASH-RT can raise the maximum tolerable dose to control tumor growth or eradicate the tumor and provide a new strategy for clinical RT. However, definitive irradiation conditions for reproducing the FLASH effect and the biological mechanism of the FLASH effect have not yet been fully elucidated. The efficacy of FLASH-RT is controversial despite its successful application in clinical RT. The present review recapitulates the progression of FLASH-RT and critically comments on the hypothesis of the FLASH effect. In addition, the review expounds on the current issues with regard to the differential phenomena between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.