ArticleSynthetic and systems biotechnology2025
Assessing the physiological properties of baker's yeast based on single-cell Raman spectrum technology.
Article in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Covalent Microcontact Bioprinting of Lubricant-Infused Microarrays for Biological Assays.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Raman flow cytometry based single-cell species classification, viable-cell counting and vitality test for probiotic products.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With rapid progress in the yeast fermentation industry, a comprehensive commercial yeast quality assessment approach integrating efficiency, accuracy, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness is required. In this study, a new yeast quality assessment method based on single-cell Raman technology was developed and contrasted with traditional methods. The findings demonstrated significant associations (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.933 on average) between the two methods in measuring physiological indicators, including cell viability and intracellular trehalose content, demonstrating the credibility of the Raman method compared to the traditional method. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the Raman method in viable but non-culturable cells was higher in measuring yeast cell viability (17.9 % more sensitive). According to the accurate quantitative analysis of metabolic activity level (MAL) of yeast cells, the cell vitality was accurately quantified at population and single-cell levels, offering a more comprehensive assessment of yeast fermentation performance. Overall, the single-cell Raman method integrates credibility, feasibility, accuracy, and sensitivity in yeast quality assessment, offering a new technological framework for quality assessments of live-cell yeast products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.