Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493280›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2024

Human identification by medical findings in a forensic anthropology context.

Yara Vieira Lemos, Alexandre Neves Furtado, Adriana Zatti Lima, Alexander Santos Dionísio, Ricardo Moreira Araújo, Eugénia Cunha

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yara Vieira LemosServiço de Antropologia Forense, Instituto Médico Legal Dr. André Roquette, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7448-7195
Alexandre Neves FurtadoServiço de Antropologia Forense, Instituto Médico Legal Dr. André Roquette, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5107-859X
Adriana Zatti LimaServiço de Antropologia Forense, Instituto Médico Legal Dr. André Roquette, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alexander Santos DionísioServiço de Antropologia Forense, Instituto Médico Legal Dr. André Roquette, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ricardo Moreira AraújoServiço de Antropologia Forense, Instituto Médico Legal Dr. André Roquette, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1669-7936
Eugénia CunhaUniversity of Coimbra Centre for Functional Ecology, Laboratory of Forensic Anthropology, Department of Life Sciences; Coimbra and National Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2998-371X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a series of three complex forensic cases that posed significant challenges for identifying human remains. These include a mass dam disaster, burnt human remains, and extensively decomposed human remains. Positive identification was achieved using a shadow positioning technique with imaging comparisons of medical findings. After establishing the biological profile, medical data were evaluated with digital radiography and computed tomography examinations the human remains. These aimed to replicate the original (intravitam) traits in the same angulation to examine postsurgical characteristics, as well as the anatomical, pathological, and morphological features, which were sufficient to establish a positive scientific identification. Technological advancements tend to reveal additional skeletal details, making medical data comparisons significantly more effective in the context of anthropological identification. These cases demonstrate that the possibility of identification should never be ignored, even in situations with advanced decomposition. Key points: Conventional identification methods may not always be applicable in forensic anthropology cases.The presented cases include a mass dam disaster, burnt human remains, and extensively decomposed human remains.These three cases involved successful human identification with medical findings comparisons using the shadow position technique.Identification could be established in these cases, despite challenges, such as fire damage, an incomplete body, and extensive decomposition.These cases suggest medical findings should be considered as biological identifiers rather than secondary identifiers.

Indexed as

forensic anthropologyhuman identificationlegal medicinemedical findings

Identifiers

PMID39493280
PMCPMC11530380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.