Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493277›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024

Functional correlates of executive dysfunction in primary progressive aphasia: a systematic review.

Kristin Thomsen, Stefanie Keulen, Seçkin Arslan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristin ThomsenUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, BCL, Nice, France.
Stefanie KeulenBrussels Centre for Language Studies (BCLS), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Seçkin ArslanUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, BCL, Nice, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recent research has recognized executive dysfunction as another component affected in Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). This systematic review aimed to examine what information distinctive neurophysiological markers can provide in the evaluation of executive function (EF) deficits in PPA, and to what effect executive function deficits can be assessed through the characteristics of functional markers. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search following the PRISMA guidelines across studies that employed neuropsychological assessments and neurophysiological imaging techniques (EEG, MEG; PET, SPECT, fMRI, fNIRS) to investigate executive dysfunction correlates in PPA. Results: Findings from nine articles including a total number of 111 individuals with PPA met our inclusion criteria and were synthesized. Although research on the neural correlates of EF deficits is scarce, MEG studies revealed widespread oscillatory slowing, with increased delta and decreased alpha power, where alterations in alpha, theta, and beta activities were significant predictors of executive function deficits. PET findings demonstrated significant correlations between executive dysfunction and hypometabolism in frontal brain regions. fMRI results indicated elevated homotopic connectivity in PPA patients, with a broader and more anterior distribution of abnormal hippocampal connections of which were associated with reduced executive performance. Conclusion: Our study provides indirect support for the assumption regarding the significance of the frontal regions and inferior frontal junction in executive control and demonstrates that neurophysiological tools can be a useful aid to further investigate clinical-neurophysiological correlations in PPA.

Indexed as

executive functionsfMRIMEGneurophysiological imagingneuropsychologyPETprimary progressive aphasia

Identifiers

PMID39493277
PMCPMC11528424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.