ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2024
A Comparative Study of Surgical Approaches for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Conversion versus Direct Resection.
Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three Noble Metal Nanoparticles Demonstrated Distinct Biological Interactions and Cell Death Pathways in Human Hepatocarcinoma Cell Lines.Nanotechnology, science and applications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of This study is exploring the intraoperative and perioperative differences between patients undergoing conversion surgery and those undergoing direct surgery, so as to improve preoperative preparation. Methods: The retrospective study was approved by an ethics review committee. A total of 232 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent surgical resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from September 2022 to December 2023 were included, comprising 210 operating patients and 53 conversion patients. Propensity score matching was employed for comparison in order to minimize bias. Results: The conversion group had more intraoperative bleeding (each P=0.001), longer operation time (P=0.033; PSM p=0.025), and higher intraoperative blood transfusion rate (p=0.001; PSM p=0.044). The incidence of perioperative complications, including perioperative ascites formation (p=0.011; PSM p=0.005), moderate to severe anemia (p=0.001; PSM p=0.002), postoperative blood transfusion (p=0.004; PSM p=0.036), and postoperative ICU transfer (p=0.041; PSM p=0.025), was higher in the conversion group compared to the operation group. The postoperative hospital stay (p=0.001; PSM p=0.003) was prolonged in the conversion group. Conclusion: Post-conversion operations carry a higher risk of bleeding and are more likely to result in moderate to severe anemia and ascites formation in the perioperative period. However, the risk is reversible with adequate preoperative blood preparation and prompt postoperative symptomatic treatment. Conversion patients should be encouraged to undergo operating therapy when they can withstand surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.