ArticleCureus2024
Exploring the Link Between Factors in Musculoskeletal Oncology Surgery Fellowships and Industry Supplemental Income.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction In the complex landscape of healthcare economics, the financial relationship between physicians and industry remains a topic of significant interest and reflection. While the dynamics of industry relationships in certain orthopedic subspecialties have been well documented, the intricacies of industry payments within musculoskeletal (MSK) oncology programs have yet to be thoroughly explored. In this study, we aim to examine the relationship between academic and industry productivity at the fellowship level. Additionally, we seek to identify the associations between the flow of industry supplemental income to orthopedic oncologists and the specific residency and fellowship training programs they are affiliated with. Methodology A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Scopus, and other relevant databases in 2023. This study included 19 fellowship programs across the United States, encompassing a total of 68 faculty physicians. Various variables were examined, including H-index, lifetime supplemental income, geographical location, residency affiliation, and association with top-ranked hospitals. Results A statistically significant correlation was found between academic and industry productivity at the individual faculty level (p = 0.003), but not at the fellowship level (p = 0.198). The top 10% of earners accounted for approximately 70% of the total lifetime supplemental income among all fellowship faculty. Additionally, there was no statistically significant association between lifetime supplemental income or academic productivity per fellowship and geographical region, nor with the ranking of affiliated residency programs or hospitals. Conclusions Industry productivity among individual faculty in MSK oncology fellowship programs in the United States is significantly associated with academic productivity; however, this association was not observed at the fellowship level. Furthermore, no statistically significant relationship was found regarding the region or the ranking of the affiliated residency programs or hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.