Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493150›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Breast Cancer: The Psychological Impact of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Remission.

Joseph Graham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph GrahamNeurosurgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer affects millions of people worldwide. With physical manifestations being the predominant feature of management, healthcare professionals can overlook the psychological toll that the disease can have on the patients and their support network. This literature review examines the vast multi-factorial approach that must be taken when managing breast cancer patients from initial screening to diagnostic investigations, treatment, and remission. A literature search in PubMed from January 2000 to April 2024 was executed. Data sets in the studies filtered during the literature search were collected and analysed, looking not only at the data itself but also the entirety of the study. This included its limitations and possible biases. From screening, the possibility of cancer as a diagnosis can trigger mixed emotions including fear, depression, and anxiety. During diagnostic, patients may find themselves subject to fear of negative body image evaluation and fear of judgment. Medical professionals must be prepared to support the patient when they experience these feelings. The treatment stages can be the most difficult for the patient as side effects and complications of treatment can impact their lives in numerous ways, making management challenging. These include pain, sexual dysfunction, and alopecia. Overall, the analysis of the selected literature showed areas in clinical practice that can be optimised when providing psychological support for a patient's cancer diagnosis, management, and treatment. Being able to counsel prior to the presentation of these, and ideally prevent unnecessary cases of these can substantially increase a patient's quality of life during treatment. This literature review hopes to identify and promote awareness and further implementation of support systems by healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

body dissatisfactionbreast cancer managementclinical anxietydepressiondepression in medical diseasepatient-centred carepsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID39493150
PMCPMC11531659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.