ArticleCureus2024
Orthodontic Management of a Growing Patient With a Skeletal Class III Malocclusion and an Anterior Open Bite: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Class III malocclusion presents many challenges due to its varying elements of imbalance in skeletal, dental, and soft tissues. This necessitates a comprehensive treatment plan, including growth modification during the pre-pubertal growth phase, and long-term retention to reduce the chances of orthognathic surgery later. The components of Class III malocclusion include maxillary retrognathism, mandibular prognathism, or, in some cases, a combination of both. This article presents a case report of a pre-pubertal female patient, 11.5 years old, with skeletal Class III malocclusion, who sought orthodontic treatment for a backwardly positioned upper jaw. The case was complicated due to a vertical growth pattern with an FMA of 36 degrees, a constricted maxilla in a retrognathic position, unerupted maxillary canines, mandibular anterior crowding, and an anterior open bite. During the first phase of treatment, maxillary protraction with rapid palatal expansion was performed using a facemask appliance and a bonded Hyrax expander. Corrective orthodontics with a fully fixed labial appliance followed after the retention period for maxillary expansion. A functionally stable occlusion was achieved with good vertical control. The patient was satisfied with an aesthetically pleasing smile at the end of the treatment. However, orthognathic surgery might be needed to address the problem of a prominent chin and severe vertical growth pattern. Furthermore, the patient was recommended to wear a vertical pull chin cup for 12 hours daily to prevent any further mandibular growth. Early intervention yielded favorable outcomes, including improvement in skeletal discrepancy, spontaneous eruption of maxillary canines, and an aesthetically enhanced facial profile. The present case report highlights the importance of timely management of malocclusion in growing patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.