Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493121›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Present State and Prospective Trajectory of External Breast Prosthesis (EBP): A Global Overview.

Lystra Deshong, Amalia Hosein, Kristy Samaroo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lystra DeshongBiomedical Engineering, The University of Trinidad & Tobago, Port of Spain, TTO.
Amalia HoseinBiomedical Engineering, The University of Trinidad & Tobago, Port of Spain, TTO.
Kristy SamarooBiomedical Engineering, The University of Trinidad & Tobago, Port of Spain, TTO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study intends to examine and describe the current and future status of the utilization of external breast prostheses (EBP) amongst global women diagnosed with breast cancer who have had a mastectomy. To avoid breast reconstruction, many women choose external breast prostheses (EBP) for varied reasons. This study included literature from ScienceDirect and PubMed to select relevant global articles from the year 2011 to the year 2023. The terms "external breast prosthesis breast cancer" were used as a search title for abstracts and keywords to source articles from both databases. Similar and related terms were used concurrently for searches conducted in ScienceDirect and PubMed. For this mixed-method review, qualitative data gave way to an in-depth exploration of the phenomenon, while the presentation of quantitative data demonstrated the tabulation of global publications on EBP. All studies focused on EBP use among post-operative women. A total of 22 journal articles were selected for this review. From the data six (6) themes were identified

Indexed as

breast cancerexternal breast prosthesismastectomyquality-of-lifewomen

Identifiers

PMID39493121
PMCPMC11528877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.