ArticleCureus2024
Access to Healthcare for Appendicitis Patients in the United States Based on Insurance Coverage.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis-Related Mortality Across U.S. Demographics and Regions: A 22-Year CDC WONDER Database Study.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth insurance plays a crucial role in ensuring access to healthcare services, addressing affordability concerns. Insurance options have varying wait times and acceptance challenges, which can greatly impact patients in emergency conditions, such as appendicitis. This study aims to find out the healthcare access disparities for appendicitis patients in states with low Medicaid coverage.
methodsA three-week virtual cross-sectional study (Oct 20-Nov 10, 2023) evaluated healthcare accessibility for appendicitis symptoms in North Dakota, Utah, Wyoming, and New Hampshire. Using www.healthgrades.com, data on general surgeons within 10 miles prioritizing new patients with three stars or above were collected and then analyzed with StataCorp 2023.
resultsThe study was done among 81 physicians among whom, 61 (75.31%) were male and 20 (24.69%) were female, mostly MD (76, 93.83%), DO (3, 3.70%), and APRN (2, 2.47%). Cigna (n=77) is mostly accepted by more physicians than Medicaid (n=33) across the states. The average waiting period for Cigna (9.45±10.54 days) is mostly longer than Medicaid (4.71± 9.63 days). Our findings of P-values >0.05 reveal no significant associations in insurance acceptance or waiting times.
conclusionsAlthough varying wait times were observed across states, no significant disparities were found in appointment waiting periods based on insurance types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.