ArticleCureus2024
A Survey to Determine Health Utility States After a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI): Influence of a History of TBI on Disability Perceptions.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A survey of physicians perceptions of disability outcomes after hypothetical traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) has emerged as one of the most widely used outcome instruments for evaluating ongoing disability and recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI). The influence of a personal history of TBI on disability perception and quality of life is not well understood. This study aimed to assess changes in health utility states using the GOSE among individuals with severe TBI and their caregivers compared to a general population group. We hypothesized that individuals with a history of TBI, either as patients or caregivers, would recognize health utility associated with a more severe disability than the general population group. Methodology This cross-sectional, observational study included 300 individuals with a history of severe TBI, 300 designated primary caregivers or family members, with 1:1 participation for each subject with severe TBI, and 300 participants from the general population. A computer-based survey was developed based on the GOSE. Participants assessed hypothetical scenarios representing one-year post-TBI outcomes using a standard gamble approach. The main measure for this study was participants' perceptions of health-related quality of life and preferences for different GOSE health states following TBI. Results Of the 900 initial participants, 10 were excluded. Among the remaining 890 participants, lower GOSE states were rated to have lower health utilities. The general population group exhibited a notable decrease in health utility ratings from GOSE4 to GOSE3. Individuals with a history of severe TBI and their caregivers or family members experienced the most substantial decline in health utility ratings between GOSE3 and GOSE2. TBI and caregiver/family member status correlated with higher health utility ratings. Conclusions This study validated the use of the GOSE as a health utility metric and emphasized the subjective nature of acceptable outcomes. These findings underscore the need for considering personal experiences and preferences in decision-making regarding TBI care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.