Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493113›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

CT-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Technically Challenging Oligometastatic Disease: A Case Report.

Peter L Lee, Xiaoming Chen, Ahmed ElDib, Thomas J Galloway, Mark A Hallman, Cm Charlie Ma, Joshua E Meyer, Rebecca M Shulman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05880667 (Adaptive Radiation for Abdominopelvic Metastases), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05880667 phase1recruitingnot on this map

Adaptive Radiation for Abdominopelvic Metastases (ARAM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFox Chase Cancer CenterRan2023 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsNeoplasm - Soft Tissue Pelvis Malignant Secondary, Malignant Neoplasm of StomachArmsAdaptive Stereotactic Body Radiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter L LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Xiaoming ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Ahmed ElDibDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Thomas J GallowayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Mark A HallmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Cm Charlie MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Joshua E MeyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.
Rebecca M ShulmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the application of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of oligometastatic cancers. This increasing appeal of SBRT has highlighted the need for more sophisticated radiotherapy techniques that allow high doses of radiation to be delivered to multiple sites while limiting the exposure of neighboring healthy tissue. A major obstacle to achieving this aim has been the occurrence of interfraction target variability: the tendency of both the tumor and the surrounding tissue to undergo day-to-day non-synchronous shifts in position. Such changes in the conformation of the tumor field often compromise the effectiveness of conventional SBRT prescribed for a fixed target. We report a case of oligometastatic pelvic disease where the challenge of an unusually mobile tumor was overcome with the use of a novel technique employing cone beam CT (CBCT)-based online adaptive radiotherapy (OART). The Phase I "Adaptive Radiation for Abdominopelvic Metastases (ARAM)" clinical trial was designed to determine if OART can achieve dosing targets superior to those attained using conventional radiotherapy techniques. In this case, CT adaptive planning enabled the treatment of a pelvic target prescribed per protocol to 45Gy that would otherwise have not been amenable to treatment with conventional SBRT planning. Adaptive plans showed significant improvements in target coverage while respecting critical organ constraints, resulting in a total treatment V35Gy of 89.3% and V45Gy of 52.8%, whereas the scheduled plan would have achieved V35Gy of 67.4% and V45Gy of 13.6%. Treatment times were variable (38.1-96.7 mins), and correlated with the magnitude of daily translation which ranged from 4 to 7 cm of total linear translation. The patient tolerated treatment without any adverse events. These results demonstrate a novel application of CBCT-guided OART that allowed for the administration of ablative treatment to an unexpectedly mobile target unamenable to conventional SBRT. CBCT-guided OART currently requires increased treatment time, a need which might be reduced by optimization of daily contouring. The phase 1 clinical trial NCT05880667 is ongoing and may provide further evidence that CBCT-guided OART can meet the technical challenges posed by radiotherapy for oligometastatic abdominal and pelvic disease.

Indexed as

adaptive radiation therapycone-beam computed tomography (cbct)ethosintrafraction motionoligometastatic tumorssbrt (stereotactic body radiotherapy)stereotactic ablative radiation

Identifiers

PMID39493113
PMCPMC11531304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.