ReviewCureus2024
The Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Healing of Oral Wounds: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial Efficacy of Local Therapeutic Agents Against Specific Gram-Positive Bacteria Associated with Pericoronitis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Elysee Exosome Versus Cellbooster Lift in Oral Wound Healing.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy on Oral Mucosal Wound Healing and Systemic Oxidative Stress in Diabetic Rats: An In Vivo Experimental Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Photobiomodulation therapy.JADA foundational science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is an intricate process involving biological alterations in cellular integrity. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) includes special features that speed up tissue regeneration and wound healing. The objective of this review is to examine the outcomes of photobiomodulation therapy in terms of healing. A search strategy was prepared using MeSH terms and Boolean operators. The initial search was limited to randomized controlled trials in the English language from January 2014 until January 2024. An electronic search of the National Library of Medicine (NLM catalog), Google Scholar, and Scopus was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The studies used LLLT of various wavelengths and parameters on oral wound healing. A total of 54 records were identified through database searching. In total, 14 studies were included according to the inclusion criteria. Ten studies examined the effects of LLLT in post-surgical hard and soft tissue healing in humans. Four animal studies observed the efficacy of photobiomodulation on the healing of bone tissue. All investigations found a substantial contrast between control and laser groups concerning wound epithelialization. When used as an adjunct or a substitute, LLLT has advantages in terms of pain and inflammation by boosting acetylcholine esterase synaptic activity, beta-endorphin synthesis, and serotonin production. By promoting the growth of osteoblasts and fibroblasts, LLLT can enhance the production of new bone at an early stage. Hence, further studies and meta-analyses are required for a better understanding of the mechanism and to confirm the efficacy with different parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.