ArticleCureus2024
Unexplained Intraoperative Movement During a Complex Craniotomy for Recurrent Petrous Apex Cholesterol Granuloma: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraoperative patient movement under general anesthesia, even with multiple monitoring modalities and adequate anesthetic depth, is rare but can lead to serious complications. Such movements are particularly dangerous in neurosurgical procedures, where precision is crucial. Similar risks exist in ophthalmic, spinal, and cardiac surgeries, where patient immobilization is vital to prevent adverse outcomes. This report examines the case of a 37-year-old male diagnosed with recurrent cholesterol granuloma located at the petrous apex, which necessitated neurosurgical intervention. During the procedure, the patient was placed under deep general anesthesia, and multiple neuromonitoring techniques were used to track neural and motor activity. Despite maintaining stable hemodynamic parameters and unremarkable neuromonitoring results, the patient suddenly exhibited abrupt, forceful movements involving his head and upper arms. This unexpected event during a delicate neurosurgical procedure posed a significant challenge, prompting a deeper investigation into the possible underlying causes of the patient's sudden movements, which could include factors such as insufficient anesthetic depth, muscular or neural irritation, seizure activity, or mechanical factors related to surgical equipment or technique. This case highlights the critical role of comprehensive intraoperative monitoring in ensuring patient safety, particularly during complex neurosurgical procedures where precision is essential. The use of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA), as was used in this case, presents unique challenges, as it requires a careful balance of maintaining adequate anesthetic depth without interfering with the neuromonitoring signals used during the procedure to ensure neural integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.