ArticleCureus2024
A Decade-Long Retrospective Clinicopathological Study of Appendiceal Neoplasms.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Insights from a Multicenter International Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Nonoperative management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis; results of 5 years follow.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAppendiceal neoplasms (ANs) are uncommon, representing less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors. They are most often discovered incidentally during appendectomies performed for suspected acute appendicitis. Recent studies have reported an increase in the incidence of AN. Our study aimed to analyze the spectrum of AN and determine the cases discovered incidentally. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis retrospective descriptive study was performed over 10 years, from March 2014 to March 2024, at Saveetha Medical College and Hospital in Chennai, India. Complete enumeration sampling was performed, and tumor registries were reviewed to identify all cases of AN received during the study period. The corresponding clinical and radiological data were obtained from the hospital database, whereas histopathology records were used to evaluate tumor characteristics. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed, and the spectrum of AN was analyzed.
resultsDuring the study period, 12 cases of AN were identified. Eleven cases (91.7%) were diagnosed from appendicectomy specimens, while one was from a right hemicolectomy specimen. Of these 12, nine cases (75%) were incidental findings. In our study, we found that there was a higher number of female cases, with nine out of twelve cases (75%) being female. Most patients presented with abdominal pain, and acute appendicitis was the most frequent preoperative diagnosis. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm was the most common type encountered followed by other appendiceal tumors.
conclusionThe incidence of AN has increased in recent years, with most cases being found incidentally. Given the increasing rate of incidental AN, it is vital to maintain vigilance in specimen analysis including comprehensive examination and precise grossing to ensure malignancies are not overlooked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.