ArticleCureus2024
Quantifying the Positional Deviation Between the True Flexion-Extension and Epicondylar Axes of the Elbow: A 3D Computational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective The epicondyles are commonly used surgical reference landmarks for elbow arthroplasty and external fixator application. This study aimed to investigate whether the epicondylar axis differed from the elbow's true flexion-extension (F-E) axis in terms of both rotational difference and translational offset. Methods Three-dimensional (3D) models of 15 cadaver elbows were created. The epicondylar, true F-E, and distal humeral axes were defined using the medial and lateral epicondyles and the normal vector through the trochlear groove's center respectively. Rotational difference along internal-external, varus-valgus, and flexion-extension rotation plane and translational offset in the anterior-posterior (A-P), medial-lateral (M-L), and inferior-superior (I-F) direction with reference to the distal humerus's long axis were measured. Results Minimal rotational differences of 1.9 ± 4.5, 2.1 ± 3.4, and 0.5 ± 2.7 degrees for flexion-extension, varus-valgus, and internal-external rotation were obtained respectively. Considerable translational offsets greater than 10 mm were found for the absolute medial and lateral translational offset with a statistically significant difference recorded in the M-L direction. Conclusions Small rotational differences exist between the epicondylar and true F-E axes. Significant differences are observed in the translational offset in the M-L direction and should be considered during implant alignment in order to reduce malalignment and prevent failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.