Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39493055›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Survey of Obstetric Anaesthesia Services and Practices in the United Kingdom.

James O'Carroll, Liana Zucco, Eleanor Warwick, Gill Arbane, Ramani Moonesinghe, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Nan Guo, Brendan Carvalho, Pervez Sultan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James O'CarrollTargeted Intervention, University College London, London, GBR.
Liana ZuccoAnaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Eleanor WarwickTargeted Intervention, University College London, London, GBR.
Gill ArbaneAnaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Ramani MoonesingheTargeted Intervention, University College London, London, GBR.
Kariem El-BoghdadlyAnaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Nan GuoAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine/Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Brendan CarvalhoAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine/Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Pervez SultanAnesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine/Obstetrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Variability in obstetric anaesthetia practice and care delivered within the UK is under-explored. The ObsQoR study explored structures, processes, and outcomes of obstetric anaesthesia in 107 hospitals within the UK's National Health Service, and the results of the hospital-level survey are reported here. Methods Hospitals were surveyed to assess obstetric anaesthesia provision, practice, and care delivery. Questions explored staffing, service provision and training, facilities present, clinical practices, outcome measurement, and key indicators of quality in obstetric anaesthesia. Results We received responses from 106 participating hospitals, representing 69% of all UK obstetric units. One hundred (94%) hospitals had a dedicated consultant obstetric anaesthetist within working hours, with 27 (25%) of hospitals' duty anaesthetists having additional clinical responsibilities outside the care of obstetric patients outside of working hours. Around 102 hospitals (98%) offer multidisciplinary team training, of which 95 (93%) use a simulation-based method. Dedicated high-risk antenatal clinics were present in 50 (47%) hospitals. The majority of hospitals provide written patient information in multiple languages for discussing obstetric anaesthesia options (77, 82%). Seventy-three hospitals (69%) use point-of-care testing to estimate haemoglobin concentration. Labour epidural analgesia is most commonly delivered via patient-controlled epidural analgesia in 80 (76%) hospitals, and the incidence of post-dural puncture headaches was recorded by 80 (76%) hospitals. Conclusions These results demonstrate variation in the provision of staffing, facilities, clinical practices, and outcome measurements across the UK. To deliver safe and equitable care across the UK, there needs to be standardisation of anaesthetic peripartum care based on national recommendations and the benchmarking and measurement of appropriate markers of quality.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after caesareannational health serviceobstetric guidelinesquality of carequality of recoverysurvey

Identifiers

PMID39493055
PMCPMC11531797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.