ArticleCureus2024
Microbiological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Uropathogens Isolated From Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Candida urinary tract infections, antifungal susceptibility and factors associated with candiduria among pregnant women seeking antenatal care at Murang'a County Referral Hospital, Kenya.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are more common in females than males, and during pregnancy, frequency is increased due to hormonal changes affecting the anatomy and physiology. If not treated on time, complications may develop in both the mother and fetus. This study aimed to analyze the microbiological (bacterial and yeast) profile of the isolated uropathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility.
methodsAseptically collected urine specimens were processed by the standard loop method. Identification of uropathogens was done by standard microbiological tests, and antimicrobial susceptibility was performed as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines.
resultsOut of 400 study participants, UTI was detected in 26.75% (107/400) of cases. Overall,
conclusionsUTIs in pregnancy are caused by a spectrum of both gram-negative bacilli and gram-positive cocci. Moreover, there is a rise of both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.