ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2024
Evaluating neuromuscular electrical stimulation for preventing and managing intensive care unit-acquired weakness: Current evidence and future directions.
Article in World journal of cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catheter Ablation of Atrial Tachycardia Originating From the Posterior Wall of the Left Atrium Following Prior Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging of acute myocardial injury in stroke: insights into brain lesion locations and network disconnections.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a prevalent issue in critical care, leading to significant muscle atrophy and functional impairment. Aiming to address this, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) has been explored as a therapy. This systematic review assesses NMES's safety and effectiveness in enhancing functional capacity and mobility in pre- and post-cardiac surgery patients. NMES was generally safe and feasible, with intervention sessions varying in frequency and duration. Improvements in muscle strength and 6-minute walking test distances were observed, particularly in preoperative settings, but postoperative benefits were inconsistent. NMES showed promise in preventing muscle loss and improving strength, although its impact on overall functional capacity remained uncertain. Challenges such as short ICU stays and body composition affecting NMES efficacy were noted. NMES also holds potential for other conditions like cerebral palsy and stroke. Further research is needed to optimize NMES protocols and better understand its full benefits in preventing ICU-AW and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.