ArticleOncology letters2025
Neutrophil‑to‑lymphocyte ratio and risk of disease progression in patients with nivolumab‑treated unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The heterogeneous roles of neutrophils in gastric cancer: scaffold or target?Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have associated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gastric cancer (GC). The present study aimed to examine the relationship between dynamic changes in NLR during treatment and disease progression in patients with unresectable or recurrent GC treated with nivolumab monotherapy as a third-line or later regimen. Patients treated with nivolumab as a third-line or later therapy for unresectable or recurrent GC at Gifu University Hospital (Gifu, Japan) from April 2017 to December 2021 were included. Pretreatment data and those obtained every 2 weeks after the treatment commenced were evaluated. The association between all NLR values and disease progression for each patient was evaluated using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model and restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves. The study included 44 patients (23 men and 21 women). The response and disease control rates were 6.8 and 27.3%, respectively. The median PFS and OS of all patients were 1.84 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-2.14] and 5.93 months (95% CI, 3.75-10.75), respectively. The risk for progressive disease (PD) increased with higher NLR (hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.3-3.87). The RCS curves also indicated that the higher the NLR, the higher the risk for PD, especially if the NLR value was <3.0. NLR during treatment could predict the risk of PD, suggesting that NLR could be integrated with tumor markers, computed tomographic images and other modalities to enable treatment selection without delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.