ReviewHeliyon2024
Functionalized carbon electrocatalysts in energy conversion and storage applications: A review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Removal of Malachite Green Using Activated Carbon From Coconut Husk and Groundnut Shell: Adsorption Kinetics and Electrochemical Studies.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Nanoengineered Pt-V catalysts promote efficient methanol oxidation in carbon nanotubes.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Facial synthesis of reduced grapheneoxide/magnetite nanocomposite for energy generation and toxic metal bioremediation via microbial fuel cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects of Microbial Fuel Cells: A Review.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Energy crises, along with environmental tampering, are currently a big topic on the global scene. The most promising strategy in the current research trend is the creation of ecologically pleasant renewable green alternative energy sources. Since adequate access to green, ecologically acceptable energy sources promotes industrialization and the well-being of human society. Hence, in this review, the most recent carbon electrocatalysts electrode materials prepared from porous activated carbon (PAC) in electrochemical energy conversion and storage systems due to its long life cycle, porosity and high surface area nature as well as low-cost nature have been clearly discussed. This review aims to demonstrate that the increasing interest in the synthesis of PAC is accompanied by extensive research into their application in supercapacitors, where they continue to be the preferred electrode material. Their challenges and current progress of PAC electrodes are also discussed. The systematic methods of modifying PAC from biomass as well as some commercially available carbon materials have been thoroughly summarized in this review as an alternate high-surface area electrode for the effective generation of energy in many energy conversion and storage devices. The critical assessment is also extends to evaluate its recent advancements, trends in research progress, and future prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.