ReviewHeliyon2024
Advances and challenges in the use of liquid biopsy in gynaecological oncology.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a hybrid deep learning-based framework for liver fibrosis classification using ultrasound images.iLIVER · 2026Article
- Endometriosis as a Systemic and Complex Disease: Toward Phenotype-Based Classification and Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Precision oncology in gynecologic cancers: molecular taxonomy, biomarker-guided therapeutics, and the challenge of therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in breast and gynecologic oncology: from molecular prediction to multimodal integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy - a narrative review with an update on current US governmental clinical trials targeting immunotherapy.Future science OA · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: clinical implications of ctDNA and CTCs in diagnosis, treatment and monitoring.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Beyond the Microscope: Integrating Liquid Biopsies into the Molecular Pathology Era of Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Mechanistic Insights Into the Tumor-Driving and Diagnostic Roles of KCTD Family Genes in Ovarian Cancer: An Integrated In Silico and In Vitro Analysis.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Liquid-based cytology in the era of multi-omics and artificial intelligence integration.CytoJournal · 2025Article
- The role of circulating tumor DNA in gynecological cancer management.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and cervical cancer are the three primary gynaecological cancers that pose a significant threat to women's health on a global scale. Enhancing global cancer survival rates necessitates advancements in illness detection and monitoring, with the goal of improving early diagnosis and prognostication of disease recurrence. Conventional methods for identifying and tracking malignancies rely primarily on imaging techniques and, when possible, protein biomarkers found in blood, many of which lack specificity. The process of collecting tumour samples necessitates intrusive treatments that are not suitable for specific purposes, such as screening, predicting, or evaluating the effectiveness of treatment, monitoring the presence of remaining illness, and promptly detecting relapse. Advancements in treatment are being made by the detection of genetic abnormalities in tumours, both inherited and acquired. Newly designed therapeutic approaches can specifically address some of these abnormalities. Liquid biopsy is an innovative technique for collecting samples that examine specific cancer components that are discharged into the bloodstream, such as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), cell-free RNA (cfRNA), tumour-educated platelets (TEPs), and exosomes. Mounting data indicates that liquid biopsy has the potential to improve the clinical management of gynaecological cancers through enhanced early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, recurrence detection, and therapy response monitoring. Understanding the distinct genetic composition of tumours can also inform therapy choices and the identification of suitable targeted treatments. The main benefits of liquid biopsy are its non-invasive characteristics and practicality, enabling the collection of several samples and the continuous monitoring of tumour changes over time. This review aims to provide an overview of the data supporting the therapeutic usefulness of each component of liquid biopsy. Additionally, it will assess the benefits and existing constraints associated with the use of liquid biopsy in the management of gynaecological malignancies. In addition, we emphasise future prospects in light of the existing difficulties and investigate areas where further research is necessary to clarify its rising clinical capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.