Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39492886›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Optimisation of bioaerosol sampling using an ultralight aircraft: A novel approach in determining the 3-D atmospheric biodiversity.

Maria P Plaza, Athanasios Charalampopoulos, Vivien Leier-Wirtz, Pia Viuf Ørby, Mathilde Kloster, Michael Dines Christiansen, Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann, Athanasios Damialis, Ulrich Gosewinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria P PlazaInstitute for Environmental Medicine and Integrative Health, Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg and University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Athanasios CharalampopoulosDepartment of Ecology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vivien Leier-WirtzInstitute for Environmental Medicine and Integrative Health, Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg and University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Pia Viuf ØrbyDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Mathilde KlosterAstma-Allergi Danmark, Roskilde, Denmark.
Michael Dines ChristiansenDines Avitech Aps, Havdrup, Denmark.
Claudia Traidl-HoffmannInstitute for Environmental Medicine and Integrative Health, Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg and University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Athanasios DamialisDepartment of Ecology, School of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ulrich GosewinkelDepartment of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioaerosols, such as pollen and fungal spores, are routinely monitored for agricultural, medical or urban greening practices, but sampling methodology is largely relying on techniques more than half a century old. Moreover, biomonitoring campaigns often take place in urban environments, although sources can be located outside cities' borders with ampler vegetation. Therefore, the question arises whether we are accurately picturing the biodiversity and abundance of regional bioaerosols and whether those locally detected might derive from long-distance transport, horizontally or vertically. To answer the above, we used novel, mobile monitoring devices, and aerial measurement units, like aircrafts, so as to explore bioaerosol concentrations at a variety of altitudes. An ultralight aircraft was equipped with a sampling device for bioaerosols. The device consisted of duplicate isokinetic impactors that match the physical functioning and the microscopic quantification method of the widely used ground-based Hirst-type impactors. Isokinetic airflow was realized by adjusting the air flux at the impactors' inlet to the airspeed of the aircraft. Three campaigns were made, where the comparability, efficiency and accuracy of different sampling devices were determined, namely of the abovementioned impactor, and of the mobile conventional Hirst-type pollen sampler. The campaigns involved measurements from ground level (0 m altitude) up to 900 m (above ground level (agl)) via flights. Our results showed that aircraft-based airborne pollen concentration measurements were consistently higher than those of all other devices, regardless of the altitude and sampling time. It is noteworthy that the pollen concentration exceeded 500 pollen grains/m

Indexed as

AerobiologyAir biomeAirborne samplingBioaerosol monitoringFungal sporesIsokinetic impactorPollen

Identifiers

PMID39492886
PMCPMC11531622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.