ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2024
Antibacterial Efficacy of Rotary and Reciprocating Instrumentation Techniques.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The conundrum of current endodontic disinfection strategies in microbial load reduction: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To clinically evaluate the effectiveness of rotary (ProTaper Next [PTN]) and reciprocating (Wave One Gold [WOG]) instrumentation techniques in eliminating bacteria from the root canals of teeth with apical periodontitis during a single-visit root canal treatment. Materials and methods: Forty patients were randomly assigned to the WOG or PTN instrumentation techniques groups. A single-visit root canal treatment was performed on all the patients. In both groups, root canals were irrigated with 10 ml of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and the final irrigation protocol was applied. Microbiological samples from the root canal were collected initially (Sample 1), after chemo-mechanical instrumentation (Sample 2), and after the final irrigation protocol (Sample 3). Quantification of bacteria at each stage of root canal treatment was performed using the culture method (colony-forming units [CFUs]), and bacterial species were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Results: There were 55 aerobic and anaerobic bacterial species identified. Chemo-mechanical root canal treatment with both instrumentation techniques and the final irrigation protocol significantly reduced the number of CFUs (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in antibacterial efficacy between WOG and PTN groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Although both root canal instrumentation techniques were highly effective in removing bacteria from the necrotic canals of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, no complete eradication of bacteria was found in any sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.