ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
A feasibility and usability study of a virtual reality tool (VESPA 2.0) for cognitive rehabilitation in patients with mild cognitive impairment: an ecological approach.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Immersive Technologies for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Cognitive rehabilitation using virtual reality in subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Digital Health Technologies Applied in Patients With Early Cognitive Change: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Editorial: Neuro-cognition in human movement: from fundamental experiments to bio-inspired innovation.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or "mild neurocognitive disorder" represents an intermediate status between normality and dementia. It is characterized by cognitive decline that does not significantly interfere with normal daily living activities. Virtual reality (VR) is the new frontier of rehabilitation. Methods: We enrolled 50 MCI patients who underwent a neuropsychological evaluation and participated in 40 sessions of cognitive treatment using the Virtual Environment for a Superior Neuro-Psychiatry, Second Generation (VESPA 2.0) System. This preliminary study highlights the role of VR tools for cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for the recovery of cognitive functions and consequent better management of MCI condition. Our study demonstrated that the VESPA 2.0 System is a valuable tool in a context that closely resembles real-life situations rather than controlled, artificial environments as traditional cognitive training methods. Results: The results showed that the patient group had significant improvements between T0 and T1 (assessment), in particular, in the global cognitive profile, visuospatial skills, and executive functions after treatment with the VESPA 2.0 System. Discussion: Our findings contribute with new evidence of understanding the impact of using simulations of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale in the CR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.