Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39492809›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

The DLPFC is centrally involved in resolving Stroop conflicts, suppressing distracting sensory input within the auditory and visual system.

Ann-Christine Ehlis, Lisa Zarantonello, Florian B Haeussinger, Tim Rohe, David Rosenbaum, Andreas J Fallgatter, Moritz J Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Attentional modulation of sensory gating during a visuomotor task.The journal of physiological sciences : JPS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ann-Christine EhlisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lisa ZarantonelloDepartment of Medicine DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Florian B HaeussingerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tim RoheDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
David RosenbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Andreas J FallgatterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Moritz J MaierDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tuebingen Center for Mental Health, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive control is a prerequisite for successful, goal-oriented behavior. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is assumed to be a key player in applying cognitive control; however, the neural mechanisms by which this process is accomplished are still unclear. Methods: To further address this question, an audiovisual Stroop task was used, comprising simultaneously presented pictures and spoken names of actors and politicians. Depending on the task block, participants had to indicate whether they saw the face or heard the name of a politician or an actor (visual vs. auditory blocks). In congruent trials, both stimuli (visual and auditory) belonged to the same response category (actor or politician); in incongruent trials, they belonged to different categories. During this task, activity in sensory target regions was measured via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalography (EEG), respectively. Specifically, fNIRS was used to monitor activity levels within the auditory cortex, while the EEG-based event-related potential of the N170 was considered as a marker of FFA (fusiform face area) involvement. Additionally, we assessed the effects of inhibitory theta-burst stimulation-a specific protocol based on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)-over the right DLPFC. Non-invasive brain stimulation is one of the few means to draw causal conclusions in human neuroscience. In this case, rTMS was used to temporarily inhibit the right DLPFC as a presumed key player in solving Stroop conflicts in one of two measurement sessions; then, effects were examined on behavioral measures as well as neurophysiological signals reflecting task-related activity in the frontal lobes and sensory cortices. Results: The results indicate a central role of the DLPFC in the implementation of cognitive control in terms of a suppression of distracting sensory input in both the auditory cortex and visual system (FFA) in high-conflict situations. Behavioral data confirm a reduced Stroop effect following previous incongruent trials ("Gratton effect") that was only accomplished with an intact DLPFC (i.e., following placebo stimulation). Discussion: Because non-invasive brain stimulation is uniquely suited to causally test neuroscientific hypotheses in humans, these data give important insights into some of the mechanisms by which the DLPFC establishes conflict resolution across different sensory modalities.

Indexed as

cognitive controlconflict adaptationexecutive functionsGratton effectnear-infrared spectroscopyStroop effecttranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39492809
PMCPMC11528708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.