ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2024
Comparative analysis of ferric carboxymaltose and iron sucrose in treating iron deficiency anemia in perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) compared to iron sucrose (ISC) in perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) and anemia.
methodsThis prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolled perimenopausal women (40-50 years) with HMB and hemoglobin levels between 6-10 g/dL, intolerant or non-compliant to oral iron therapy. The study compared FCM and ISC by assessing hematological parameters, including hemoglobin, ferritin, and iron levels, over a 12-week period. The patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 weeks after initiation. The adverse effects were also evaluated.
resultsThe study included 60 perimenopausal women, with 30 in each group. The baseline patient characteristics were comparable. FCM demonstrated a statistically significant higher mean increase in hemoglobin (4.97 g/dL) than ISC (4.63 g/dL) over 12 weeks. The proportion of patients achieving correction of anemia (hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL) was higher in the FCM group (75.9% vs. 65.5%). Serum ferritin levels were significantly higher in the FCM group after 3 weeks. Adverse effects were minimal and comparable between the groups. Although the direct cost of FCM is high, its ability to be administered in larger doses may result in lower total costs.
conclusionIn perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and iron deficiency anemia, FCM and ISC show comparable efficacy in increasing hemoglobin levels with similar side effect profiles. This study highlights the potential benefits of FCM and calls for further exploration of these therapies in diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.