ArticleHistology and histopathology2025
Associations between BCL-2 expression and different histopathological prognostic factors in different molecular subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.
Article in Histology and histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A meta-analysis and systematic review of different cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Low Expression of a Circular Transcript of the Apoptosis Regulator GeneBiomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is heterogeneous and the existing prognostic classifiers are limited in accuracy, leading to the unnecessary treatment of numerous women. B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), an anti-apoptotic protein, has been proposed as a marker of poor prognosis, associated with resistance to therapy in most tumor types expressing BCL-2. In breast cancer, however, BCL-2 expression has been reported to be a favorable prognostic factor. This study aimed to describe the association between BCL-2 and other well-known pathological prognostic markers among different molecular sub-types of invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC; NST).
methodsBCL-2 expression, as well as that of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), were immunohistochemically (IHC) evaluated and compared with other pathological factors, including tumor size, grade, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), and lymph node (LNd) metastasis, in 128 breast cancer cases diagnosed with IBC; NST. Moreover, we analyzed the correlation between BCL-2 expression and relapse-free survival (RFS) in all patients over a two-year period.
resultsWe found that BCL-2 expression had different pathological prognostic factor associations with different molecular subtypes of breast carcinoma. In the luminal A (i.e., hormonal receptor-positive and HER2-negative) and triple-negative subtypes, the expression of BCL-2 in tumor cells was significantly associated with tumor size, tumor grade, and TILs. BCL2-positive expression in luminal IBC; NST patients resulted in a significantly favorable two-year survival.
conclusionBCL-2 expression in IBC; NST has different prognostic effects depending on the molecular subtype of the cancer. In cancers with a HER2-enriched phenotype, BCL-2 expression was a marker of poor prognosis, while in cancers with a hormone receptor-positive phenotype, BCL-2 expression had a better prognostic impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39492626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.