Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39492464›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Building Engagement-Capable Environments for Health System Transformation: Development and Early Implementation of a Capability Framework for Patient, Family and Caregiver Engagement in Ontario Health Teams.

Julia Abelson, Laura Tripp, Reham Abdelhalim, Lotje Hives, Betty-Lou Kristy, Maureen Smith, Laura Tenhagen, Lindsay Wingham-Smith, Engagement Capable OHT Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julia AbelsonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-2783
Laura TrippDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6108-9190
Reham AbdelhalimBurlington Ontario Health Team, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Lotje HivesNipissing Wellness Ontario Health Team, North Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Betty-Lou KristyMinister's Patient and Family Advisory Council, Ministry of Health, Government of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maureen SmithPatient Partner, Ontario, Canada.
Laura TenhagenSault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay Wingham-SmithMississauga Health Ontario Health Team, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Engagement Capable OHT Working Group

Funding

This research was supported by the Government of Ontario, Ministry of Health (692).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite widespread calls to involve patients, families and caregivers (PFCs) as partners at all levels of health system planning and design, there is unevenness in how engagement efforts are supported across these settings. The concept of 'engagement-capable environments' offers a way forward to uncover the key requirements for sustainable, high-quality engagement, but more work is needed to identify the specific competencies required to create these environments. We addressed this gap by developing a capability framework for Ontario Health Teams (OHTs), a newly established structure for planning, designing, organizing and delivering care in Ontario, Canada.

methodsThe framework was co-developed by a Working Group of OHT staff and leaders, PFC partners, researchers and government personnel. Project activities occurred over four phases: (1) planning, (2) evidence review and surveying of intended users to identify key competencies, (3) framework design and (4) implementation.

resultsAn evidence review identified more than 90 potential competencies for this work. These results were contextualized and expanded through a survey of OHT stakeholders to brainstorm potential competencies, supports and enablers for engagement. Surveys were completed by 69 individuals; 689 knowledge and skill competency statements, 462 attitude and behaviour competency statements and 250 supports and enablers were brainstormed. The statements were analysed and organized into initial competency categories, which were reviewed, discussed and iteratively refined by Working Group members and through broader consultations with the OHT community. The final framework includes six competency domains and four support and enabler domains, each with sub-domain elements, mapped across a three-stage maturity model. The framework has been disseminated across OHTs, and its adoption and implementation are now requirements within OHT agreements.

conclusionThe framework combines a strong conceptual foundation with actionable elements informed by the literature and consultations with the intended users of the framework. Although developed for OHTs, the framework should be broadly applicable to other health system organizations seeking similar health system transformation goals. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patient, family and caregiver partners were involved at all stages and in all aspects of the work. As end users of the framework, their perspectives, knowledge and opinions were critical.

Indexed as

CaregiversCapacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareFamilyHumansOntarioPatient Care TeamPatient ParticipationSurveys and Questionnairesengagement‐capable environmentsframework developmentpatient engagementpatient involvement

Identifiers

PMID39492464
PMCPMC11532454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.