Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39492306›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

Comparison of the safety and persistence of immunogenicity of bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine in healthy 9-14-year-old and 18-26-year-old Chinese females: A randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Juan Li, Li-Wei Shi, Ke Li, Li-Rong Huang, Jian-Biao Li, Yu-Lian Dong, Wei Li, Min Ji, Qing Yang, Ling-Yun Zhou and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Immune Responses to Human Papillomavirus After Infection and Vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Juan LiNational Institute for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Li-Wei ShiGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Ke LiShanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Li-Rong HuangGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jian-Biao LiHezhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hezhou, Guangxi, China.
Yu-Lian DongZhongshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhongshan, Guangxi, China.
Wei LiYuxi Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Yunnan, China.
Min JiShanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Qing YangShanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Ling-Yun ZhouShanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Lin YuanWalvax Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Xue-Mei YanWalvax Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Jing-Jing ChenWalvax Biotechnology Co. Ltd, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Zhi-Wei JiangBeijing Key Tech Statistical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yang-Yang QiBeijing Key Tech Statistical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Rong-Cheng LiGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yan-Ping LiGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jie-Lai XiaAir Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Bang-Wei YuShanghai Zerun Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Zhao-Jun MoGuangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Chang-Gui LiNational Institute for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China. Electronic address: changguili@aliyun.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe assessed the safety, immunogenicity and antibody persistence of two- and three-dose schedules of the novel bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine (HPV-2, Walrinvax) in the per-protocol target population of initially seronegative 9-14 year-old girls, including a non-inferiority comparison with the three-dose schedule in 18-26 year-old women.

methodsThis randomized phase 3b trial in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, involved healthy Chinese females in two age cohorts; 600 girls aged 9-14 years and 300 women aged 18-26 years. Girls were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either two (Months 0,6) or three (Months 0,2,6) intramuscular doses of HPV-2. All participants were monitored for immunogenicity as neutralizing antibodies up to 36 months. Primary objectives were non-inferiority analyses of immunogenicity between two- and three-dose girl groups and adult women at Month 7; safety assessments were based on participant-completed diary cards.

resultsAll groups demonstrated marked increases in neutralizing antibodies against HPV 16 and 18 that persisted above baseline to 36 months. Month 7 responses in both girl groups were non-inferior to those in the women and were statistically higher after two-doses than girls or women who received three doses. GMTs waned after month 7, but then maintained a plateau level until month 36. Vaccination was well tolerated in all groups with no serious adverse events reported.

conclusionsImmune responses to two doses of HPV-2 vaccine in adolescent girls were non-inferior to those after three doses in young women, an age cohort in which clinical efficacy of HPV-2 against cervical cancer has been demonstrated.

Indexed as

Human Papilloma VirusImmunogenicitySafetyTolerabilityVaccine: girls

Identifiers

PMID39492306
PMCPMC10680975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.