Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39492159›Full record

ArticlePlant communications2023

Transcriptional Landscape of Cotton Roots in Response to Salt Stress at Single-cell Resolution.

Pengtao Li, Qiankun Liu, Yangyang Wei, Chaozhu Xing, Zhongping Xu, Fang Ding, Yuling Liu, Quanwei Lu, Nan Hu, Tao Wang and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Single-cell insights into plant growth, adaptation, and evolution.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Growth-Promoting Effects ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Promotion of maize seedling growth byFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Pengtao LiCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; Research Base, Anyang Institute of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Qiankun LiuCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; School of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China.
Yangyang WeiCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Chaozhu XingState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; Research Base, Anyang Institute of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Zhongping XuHubei Hongshan Laboratory, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Fang DingHubei Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, P. R. China.
Yuling LiuCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Quanwei LuCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Nan HuCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Tao WangCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Xiangqian ZhuHubei Hongshan Laboratory, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shuang ChengCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; School of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China.
Zhaoguo LiCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; School of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China.
Zilin ZhaoCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Yanfang LiCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Jiangping HanState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Xiaoyan CaiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Zhongli ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Kunbo WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China.
Baohong ZhangDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA.
Fang LiuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; Research Base, Anyang Institute of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, Henan, China. Electronic address: liufcri@163.com.
Shuangxia JinHubei Hongshan Laboratory, National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, China. Electronic address: liufcri@163.com.
Renhai PengCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anyang Institute of Technology, Anyang, Henan, 455000, China; Research Base, Anyang Institute of Technology, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Anyang 455000, Henan, China; School of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China. Electronic address: liufcri@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing soil salinization has led to severe losses of plant yield and quality. Thus, it is urgent to investigate the molecular mechanism of the salt stress response. In this study, we took systematically analyzed cotton root response to salt stress by single-cell transcriptomics technology; 56,281 high-quality cells were totally obtained from 5-days-old lateral root tips of Gossypium arboreum under natural growth and different salt-treatment conditions. Ten cell types with an array of novel marker genes were synthetically identified and confirmed with in situ RNA hybridization, and some specific-type cells of pesudotime analysis also pointed out their potential differentiation trajectory. The prominent changes of cell numbers responding to salt stress were observed on outer epidermal and inner endodermic cells, which were significantly enriched in response to stress, amide biosynthetic process, glutathione metabolism, and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis. Other functional aggregations were concentrated on plant-type primary cell wall biogenesis, defense response, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and metabolic pathways by analyzing the abundant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified from multiple comparisons. Some candidate DEGs related with transcription factors and plant hormones responding to salt stress were also identified, of which the function of Ga03G2153, an annotated auxin-responsive GH3.6, was confirmed by using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). The GaGH3.6-silenced plants presented severe stress-susceptive phenotype, and suffered more serious oxidative damages by detecting some physiological and biochemical indexes, indicating that GaGH3.6 might participate in salt tolerance in cotton through regulating oxidation-reduction process. For the first time, a transcriptional atlas of cotton roots under salt stress were characterized at a single-cell resolution, which explored the cellular heterogeneityand differentiation trajectory, providing valuable insights into the molecular mechanism underlying stress tolerance in plants.

Indexed as

cottonroot-type cellssalt stressscRNA-seqvirus-induced gene silencing

Identifiers

PMID39492159
PMCPMC10873896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.