Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39491810›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2025

Orphan genes are not a distinct biological entity.

Andres Barboza Pereira, Matthew Marano, Ramya Bathala, Rigoberto Ayala Zaragoza, Andres Neira, Alex Samano, Adekola Owoyemi, Claudio Casola

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imported, not invented, genes prevail amongProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. De Novo Genes: Current Status and Future Goals.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Orphan genes are not a distinct biological entity.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andres Barboza PereiraInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Genetics & Genomics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Matthew MaranoInterdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Ramya BathalaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Rigoberto Ayala ZaragozaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Andres NeiraSchool of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Alex SamanoDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Adekola OwoyemiDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Claudio CasolaInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Genetics & Genomics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4853-1866

Funding

Texas A&M AgriLife ResearchTexas A&M Forest ServiceUSDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1019860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome sequencing revolution has revealed that all species possess a large number of unique genes critical for trait variation, adaptation, and evolutionary innovation. One widely used approach to identify such genes consists of detecting protein-coding sequences with no homology in other genomes, termed orphan genes. These genes have been extensively studied, under the assumption that they represent valid proxies for species-specific genes. Here, we critically evaluate taxonomic, phylogenetic, and sequence evolution evidence showing that orphan genes belong to a range of evolutionary ages and thus cannot be assigned to a single lineage. Furthermore, we show that the processes generating orphan genes are substantially more diverse than generally thought and include horizontal gene transfer, transposable element domestication, and overprinting. Thus, orphan genes represent a heterogeneous collection of genes rather than a single biological entity, making them unsuitable as a subject for meaningful investigation of gene evolution and phenotypic innovation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsGene Transfer, HorizontalGenomeHumansDNA Transposable Elementsgene evolutionlineage‐specific genesORFansphylostratigraphyspecies‐specific genestaxonomically restricted genes

Identifiers

PMID39491810
PMCPMC11662153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.