Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39491806›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

A cross-sectional survey exploring knowledge, beliefs and barriers to whole food plant-based diets amongst registered dietitians in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Michael Metoudi, Alexander Bauer, Tanya Haffner, Shireen Kassam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. How Sustainable Are Hospital Menus in the United Kingdom? Identifying Untapped Potential Based on a Novel Scoring System for Plant-Based Provisions.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael MetoudiPlant-Based Health Professionals UK, London, UK.
Alexander BauerInstitute for Prevention and Cancer Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Tanya HaffnerMyNutriWeb, London, UK.
Shireen KassamKing's College London, University of Winchester, Hampshire, UK.

Funding

Plant-Based Health Professionals UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant-based diets (PBDs) have gained popularity in recent years due to their co-benefits for human and planetary health. Although clinical guidelines now recommend well-balanced PBDs, it remains unclear how dietitians in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI) view such diets and their implementation in practice. This study aimed to evaluate the perspectives of registered dietitians (RDs) on the role of a whole food plant-based diet (WFPBD) in clinical practice.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted amongst RDs in the UK and ROI between September and November 2023.

resultsA total of 335 RDs participated in the survey. Most RDs (76%) agree that a well-planned WFPBD is suitable for all stages of life, with some (48%) expressing concerns over the risk of malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies. Three-quarters of RDs (75%) incorrectly thought that plant protein is incomplete, necessitating protein combining. A WFPBD was on average ranked fourth out of 14 dietary strategies for managing some of the leading non-communicable diseases. Excluding dairy and eggs was the primary reason preventing RDs from personally adopting a WFPBD, whereas meal preparation and cost were the main barriers for their clients. The majority of RDs (79%) feel they did not receive sufficient education on WFPBDs, with 58% agreeing there are insufficient evidence-based resources available in their field. Only 33% feel supported when advocating for a WFPBD in their workplace.

conclusionsAlthough many RDs view WFPBDs as viable and clinically relevant, significant barriers to their implementation exist, underscoring the need for enhanced education and support.

Indexed as

Diet, VegetarianHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritionistsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, Plant-BasedFemaleHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdomplanetary healthplant‐based dietregistered dietitiansustainabilitysustainable dietsvegan

Identifiers

PMID39491806
PMCPMC11589407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.