Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39491315›Full record

ArticleBioelectromagnetics2025

Action potential threshold variability for different electrostimulation models and its potential impact on occupational exposure limit values.

Florian Soyka, Thomas Tarnaud, Carsten Alteköster, Ruben Schoeters, Tom Plovie, Wout Joseph, Emmeric Tanghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioelectromagnetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florian SoykaInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health, German Social Accident Insurance, Sankt Augustin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-0491
Thomas TarnaudINTEC-WAVES, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.
Carsten AltekösterInstitute for Occupational Safety and Health, German Social Accident Insurance, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
Ruben SchoetersINTEC-WAVES, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.
Tom PlovieINTEC-WAVES, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9307-1702
Wout JosephINTEC-WAVES, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8807-0673
Emmeric TangheINTEC-WAVES, Ghent University-IMEC, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1230222N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational exposure limit values (ELVs) for body internal electric fields can be derived from thresholds for action potential generation. These thresholds can be calculated with electrostimulation models. The spatially extended nonlinear node model (SENN) is often used to determine such thresholds. Important parameters of these models are the membrane channel dynamics describing the ionic transmembrane currents as well as the temperature at which the models operate. This work compares action potential thresholds for five different membrane channel dynamics used with the SENN model. Furthermore, two more detailed double-cable models by Gaines et al. (MRG-Sensory and MRG-Motor) are also considered in this work. Thresholds calculated with the SENN model and the MRG models are compared for frequencies between 1 Hz and 100 kHz and temperatures at 22°C and 37°C. Results show that MRG thresholds are lower than SENN thresholds. Deriving alternative ELVs from these thresholds shows that the alternative ELVs can change significantly with different ion channel dynamics (up to a factor of 22). Using the double cable model could lead to approximately ten times lower alternative exposure limit values. On the contrary, using the SENN model with different membrane channel dynamics could also lead to higher alternative exposure limit values. Therefore, future exposure guidelines should take the influence of different electrostimulation models into account when deriving ELVs.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsElectric StimulationOccupational ExposureHumansModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsTemperatureThreshold Limit Valuesaxon modelingelectromagnetic exposureintermediate frequenciesmembrane channel dynamicssafety guidelines and standards

Identifiers

PMID39491315
PMCPMC11650558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.