Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39491049›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

The capacity limitations of multiple-template visual search during task preparation and target selection.

Anna Grubert, Ziyi Wang, Ella Williams, Mikel Jimenez, Roger Remington, Martin Eimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna GrubertDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-7317
Ziyi WangDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Ella WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Mikel JimenezDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-6782
Roger RemingtonDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Martin EimerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/V002708/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2020-319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search is guided by mental representations of target-defining features (attentional templates) that are activated in a preparatory fashion. It remains unknown how many templates can be maintained concurrently, and what kind of costs are associated with multiple-template versus single-template search. Here, we compared the operation of attentional templates during three-color and single-color search tasks. Preparatory template activation processes were tracked by measuring N2pc components to task-irrelevant singleton color probes that appeared in rapid succession during the interval between search displays. These probes attract attention (as indexed by an N2pc) if the corresponding color template is active at the time when the probe appears. In a three-color search task where target identity was fully predictable (Experiment 1), only probes that matched the upcoming target color triggered N2pcs, demonstrating that only a single target template was activated. When three possible color targets appeared randomly and unpredictably (Experiment 2), probes that matched any of these colors triggered N2pcs, demonstrating that all three templates were activated concurrently. However, relative to a single-color search task, clear costs emerged in this three-color task for attentional guidance toward search targets and for search performance. These costs appear to be linked to inhibitory interactions between simultaneously active search templates. These findings show that while at least three target templates can be maintained in parallel, multiple-template search is still subject to capacity limitations which affect both template-guided attentional guidance and the subsequent selective processing of search targets.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung Adultattentional controlattentional templatescapacity limitationsevent‐related potentialsN2pcvisual search

Identifiers

PMID39491049
PMCPMC11775862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.