Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39490996›Full record

ArticleBMC rheumatology2024

Norwegian society of rheumatology recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica: a narrative review.

Stig Tengesdal, Andreas P Diamantopoulos, Lene Kristin Brekke, Emilio Besada, Geirmund Myklebust

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stig TengesdalDepartment of Research, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway. stig.tengesdal@gmail.com.
Andreas P DiamantopoulosDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious diseases, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Lene Kristin BrekkeDepartment of Rheumatology, Haugesund Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Haugesund, Norway.
Emilio BesadaDepartment of Medicine, Hospital of Finnmark, Kirkenes, Norway.
Geirmund MyklebustDepartment of Research, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo provide evidence-based, up-to-date recommendations for physicians in primary and specialist healthcare setting in diagnosing and treating patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).

methodsThe PMR working group conducted a narrative review of the available evidence in the field and wrote the draft guidelines. These guidelines were discussed and revised according to the standard operating procedures within the Norwegian Society of Rheumatology. The European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations for the management of PMR, the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines for the management for PMR, the treat-to-target recommendations in giant cell arteritis and PMR and the 2023 recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica were used in particular for purpose of harmonization.

resultsA total of 10 recommendations have been formulated covering initial diagnostic investigations, comorbidity assessment, imaging, specialist referral criteria, treatment involving glucocorticoids and steroid-sparing agents and follow-up care.

conclusionNorwegian recommendations for diagnostics and treatment to improve management and outcome in patients with PMR were developed.

Indexed as

DiagnosisGuidelineManagementPolymyalgia rheumaticaTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39490996
PMCPMC11533311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.