Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39490992›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2024

MAGqual: a stand-alone pipeline to assess the quality of metagenome-assembled genomes.

Annabel Cansdale, James P J Chong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Annabel CansdaleCentre of Excellence for Anaerobic Digestion, Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. annabel.cansdale@york.ac.uk.
James P J ChongCentre of Excellence for Anaerobic Digestion, Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetagenomics, the whole genome sequencing of microbial communities, has provided insight into complex ecosystems. It has facilitated the discovery of novel microorganisms, explained community interactions and found applications in various fields. Advances in high-throughput and third-generation sequencing technologies have further fuelled its popularity. Nevertheless, managing the vast data produced and addressing variable dataset quality remain ongoing challenges. Another challenge arises from the number of assembly and binning strategies used across studies. Comparing datasets and analysis tools is complex as it requires the quantitative assessment of metagenome quality. The inherent limitations of metagenomic sequencing, which often involves sequencing complex communities, mean community members are challenging to interrogate with traditional culturing methods leading to many lacking reference sequences. MIMAG standards aim to provide a method to assess metagenome quality for comparison but have not been widely adopted.

resultsTo address the need for simple and quick metagenome quality assignation, here we introduce the pipeline MAGqual (Metagenome-Assembled Genome qualifier) and demonstrate its effectiveness at determining metagenomic dataset quality in the context of the MIMAG standards.

conclusionsThe MAGqual pipeline offers an accessible way to evaluate metagenome quality and generate metadata on a large scale. MAGqual is built in Snakemake to ensure readability and scalability, and its open-source nature promotes accessibility, community development, and ease of updates. MAGqual is built in Snakemake, R, and Python and is available under the MIT license on GitHub at https://github.com/ac1513/MAGqual . Video Abstract.

Indexed as

MetagenomeMetagenomicsBacteriaHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicrobiotaSoftwareBioinformaticsBioinformatics workflowMAGsMetagenome-assembled genomesMetagenomicsMicrobiomePipelineSnakemake

Identifiers

PMID39490992
PMCPMC11533350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.