Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39490139›Full record

ReviewPhysics of life reviews2024

Update on "Emotion and autobiographical memory": 14 years of advances in understanding functions, constructions, and consequences.

Leonard Faul, Jaclyn H Ford, Elizabeth A Kensinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physics of life reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonard FaulDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Jaclyn H FordDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
Elizabeth A KensingerDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA. Electronic address: elizabeth.kensinger.1@bc.edu.

Funding

Bringing positive and negative events to mind: Effects of age on emotional memory retrievalR01AG075031 · NIA · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI Elizabeth Ann Kensinger · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Holland and Kensinger (2010) reviewed the literature on "Emotion and autobiographical memory." They focused on two broad ways that emotions influence memory: (1) emotion during an event influences how the event is remembered, and (2) emotion and emotional goals during memory retrieval influence how past events are remembered. We begin by providing a brief update on the key points from that review. Holland and Kensinger (2010) also had noted a number of important avenues for future work. Here, we describe what has been learned about the functions of autobiographical memory and their reconstructive nature. Relatedly, we review more recent research on memory reconstruction in the context of visual perspective shifts, counterfactual thinking, nostalgia, and morality. This research has emphasized the reciprocal nature of the interactions between emotion and autobiographical memory: Not only do emotions influence memory, memories influence emotions. Next, we discuss advances that have been made in understanding the reciprocal relations between stress, mood, and autobiographical memory. Finally, we discuss the research that is situating emotional autobiographical memories within a social framework, providing a bedrock for collective memories. Despite the many advances of the past 14 years, many open questions remain; throughout the review we note domains in which we hope to see advances over the next decades.

Indexed as

EmotionsMemory, EpisodicHumans

Identifiers

PMID39490139
PMCPMC11725323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.