ArticleScientific reports2024
The search for non-evoked markers of pain in the GTN mouse model of migraine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodent migraine models have been developed to study the underlying molecular mechanisms of migraine, but these need further development and validation to stay relevant. The glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) mouse model with tactile hypersensitivity as the primary readout, has been highly used to understand the pathophysiology of migraine. Nevertheless, this readout has questionable translatability to the experience of spontaneous pain and additional readouts are needed to improve this model. We explored the applicability of several spontaneous behaviours and burrowing activity as additional markers to detect effects of repeated GTN injections in mice. We used the Laboratory Animal Behaviour Observation Registration and Analysis System (LABORAS) test system to understand the potential effect of GTN on locomotion and other behavioral parameters in two different experiments. Burrowing was used to investigate the potential effect on GTN on a voluntary innate behavior of mice. We found no clear effect of GTN on either locomotion or burrowing in these experiments. With our experimental design, there was no significant difference between GTN and vehicle and neither locomotion nor burrowing activity will readily supplement the von Frey test. The search for additional none-evoked markers of pain in rodent migraine models will continue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.