ArticleScientific reports2024
Bone conduction stimulated VEMPs by using the B250 transducer to assess the nerve of origin of sporadic vestibular schwannomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials to Diagnose Vestibular Neuritis: A Scoping Review.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Ocular VEMP Using Bone Conduction Stimuli at the Forehead - A Pilot Study Comparing B250, Minishaker and Tendon Hammer with Vibrometry Validation.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are a tool to assess otolith function and a component of sensor specific vestibular diagnostics. The aim of the present study was to measure VEMP trough bone conducted (BC) stimulation using the B250 prototype and to report amplitudes, latencies and threshold levels for patients before resection of a sporadic unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) in order to assess function regarding to the reported nerve of origin. Twenty-seven participants (9 male/18 female) with a mean age of 55.9 years (SD: 10.8) were included for the analysis. In the side contralateral to the tumor, in 24 (89%) of the patients cVEMP could be measured, while oVEMP were recordable in 20 patients (74%). For patients with inferior vestibular nerve of origin (n = 11), cVEMP amplitudes of the affected side were significantly lower as compared to the non-affected side, while the force threshold level was increased. No statistically significant differences were observed for neither, oVEMP amplitudes nor threshold levels in the group with superior vestibular nerve of origin (n = 7). Across groups, p13 latency was significantly increased in the affected ear while all other VEMP latencies were not different between the ears. The B250 transducer was applicable to all participants of the clinical cohort. The sample size, however, was too low for a reliable statistical analysis and only allowed for exploratory analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.