ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
Bias and precision of SPECT-based
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimisation of Q.Clear (BSREM) Reconstruction Parameters forBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of modified window-based scatter compensation in quantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Fast [EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Direct estimation of activity concentration in regional voxels with application toMedical physics · 2026Article
- Quantitative SPECT/CT: Technique and Clinical Applications.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026Review
- Accuracy of a whole-body single-photon emission computed tomography with a thallium-bromide detector: Verification via Monte Carlo simulations.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim was to compare bias and precision for
methodsPhantom experiments were performed on a GE Discovery 670 system with 5/8'' NaI(Tl) crystal (dual-headed Anger system) and a GE StarGuide (ring-configured CZT system). Six spheres (1.2 mL to 113 mL) in a NEMA PET body phantom were filled with
resultsThe two systems showed similar mean relative errors and CVs for
conclusionsThe ring-configured CZT system is a viable alternative to the dual-headed Anger system equipped with medium-energy collimators for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.