ArticleScientific reports2024
Morphological discrimination of human lice (Anoplura: Pediculidae) by eggs' cap-like operculum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptations of seal louse nits to underwater life: morphology, respiration and attachment.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2026Article
- Detection and Genetic Diversity of Heritable Bacterial Symbionts in Human Lice Based on 16S-rRNA Gene.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human lice have long been parasites of humans and are responsible for several epidemics in human medical history. However, their morphology, particularly head and body lice, remains very similar. In this study, we discriminate human louse species based on the number, shape and size of aeropyles (respiratory pores) of the egg operculum as well as the size of the respiratory orifice in the aeropyles. For this purpose, lice and eggs were collected from infested patients referring to Parasitology Department of Avicenne Hospital (Bobigny, France) and analyzed morphologically. The microscopic examination of the aeropyles revealed a large variation in the number ranging from 5 to 12 for head lice, 10 to 16 for body lice and 13 to 18 for pubic lice with a statistically distinct average of 8.3, 12.9 and 15.7, respectively. Although the length of the head and body louse eggs were almost similar, the width of body louse eggs were bigger than those of head louse (412.9 μm and 363.5 μm, respectively), while pubic louse eggs had the smallest length (692.9 μm) and width (286.1 μm). In addition, pubic louse eggs had a greater operculum length and width (253.7 μm length and 220.7 μm width) than head (230.6 μm length and 210.2 μm width) and body lice (227.9 μm length and 199.9 μm width). Moreover, pubic lice had the smallest average aeropyle size (41.2 μm) compared to head (51.1 μm) and body lice (49.1 μm). The respiratory orifice on the aeropyles of head and body lice (9.9 μm) were almost twice as big as those of pubic lice (4.9 μm). There was an inverse correlation between the number of aeropyles and their size in head, body and pubic lice. These findings are helpful in accurate identification of human louse species using their eggs, which could be useful for control management strategies against these ectoparasites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.